Memory vs MCP Cli

In-depth architectural comparison of the Memory and MCP Cli MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Memory when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Other Tools and Integrations domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Knowledge graph-based data storage, Persistent memory for LLMs, Reference implementation for MCP SDK usage.

Explore Memory Details

Choose MCP Cli when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Other Tools and Integrations domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: OAuth 2.0 (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Run MCP servers from local code or npm packages, List and call tools, resources, and prompts, Support for OAuth authentication with SSE and HTTP streaming servers.

Explore MCP Cli Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Memory VerifiedOther Tools and Integrations	MCP Cli wong2 Other Tools and Integrations
Summary	Knowledge graph-based persistent memory system.	A CLI inspector for the Model Context Protocol
Category & Scope	Other Tools and Integrations

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "memory": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/server-memory"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "wong2-mcp-cli": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@wong2/mcp-cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons