Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Memory MCP Lite vs NeuroStack
In-depth architectural comparison of the Memory MCP Lite and NeuroStack MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Memory MCP Lite
Finance & Fintech · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
NeuroStack
Finance & Fintech · Local stdio
Quality: 44/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Memory MCP Lite if you need specialized Finance & Fintech tools running via a local process. Choose NeuroStack if your workspace requires Finance & Fintech integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
M
Choose Memory MCP Lite when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
N
Choose NeuroStack when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Memory MCP Lite Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
NeuroStack Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Memory MCP Lite Configuration
NeuroStack Configuration