Memharness vs Pensieve

In-depth architectural comparison of the Memharness and Pensieve MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Memharness when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Memharness Details

P

Choose Pensieve when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Pensieve Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Memharness Databases	P Pensieve Databases
Summary	Bi-temporal, provenance-carrying long-term memory for AI agents, in one SQLite file.	Manually-triggered, self-organising personal memory for AI agents; SQLite, no vector DB.
Category & Scope	Databases	Databases
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "memharness": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@memharness/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pensieve": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "pensieve-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons