Mednode vs Kastell — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
Mednode vs Kastell
A side-by-side look at the Mednode and Kastell MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Kastell tools
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
Mednode
No confirmed install command for Mednode yet — follow the setup steps linked from its listing page rather than a guessed package name.
Mednode is categorized under Security and uses an install path we have not confirmed yet. Kastell belongs to Security and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick Mednode for security work and Kastell for security.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client. Mednode has no confirmed install command yet — follow its own setup instructions.
Mednode has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. Kastell is listed as free. Auth: no auth required. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add mednode and kastelldev-kastell as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, Mednode has a quality signal of 37/100 (Fair) with 0 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars. Kastell has 61/100 (Good) with 4 views, 0 installs and 60 GitHub stars.