A side-by-side look at the MCPComp Diagnostics and Build MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose MCPComp Diagnostics for developer tools work; choose Build for developer tools as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
M
Choose MCPComp Diagnostics when
You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Build tools
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
MCPComp Diagnostics
No confirmed install command for MCPComp Diagnostics yet — follow the setup steps linked from its listing page rather than a guessed package name.
MCPComp Diagnostics is categorized under Developer Tools and uses an install path we have not confirmed yet. Build belongs to Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick MCPComp Diagnostics for developer tools work and Build for developer tools.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client. MCPComp Diagnostics has no confirmed install command yet — follow its own setup instructions.
MCPComp Diagnostics has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. Build is listed as free. Auth: no auth required. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add mcpcomp-diagnostics and build as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, MCPComp Diagnostics has a quality signal of 37/100 (Fair) with 0 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars. Build has 51/100 (Good) with 5 views, 0 installs and 139 GitHub stars.