MCP VS Code vs KittyClaw

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP VS Code and KittyClaw MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP VS Code when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore MCP VS Code Details

Choose KittyClaw when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore KittyClaw Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP VS Code Developer Tools	KittyClaw Developer Tools
Summary	A self-hosted VS Code workbench embedded as an interactive MCP App.	Drive KittyClaw, a self-hosted agent-fleet kanban, from any MCP client (embedded /mcp endpoint).
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-vs-code": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@mario.andreschak/mcp-vscode@0.2.4"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kittyclaw": {
      "url": "https://kittyclaw.dev"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons