MCP Ts Core vs Mcpuptimeledger MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Ts Core and Mcpuptimeledger MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Ts Core when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore MCP Ts Core Details

Choose Mcpuptimeledger MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: check_mcp_server_uptime, validate_tool_schema, detect_auth_failure.

Explore Mcpuptimeledger MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP Ts Core Monitoring	Mcpuptimeledger MCP Monitoring
Summary	TypeScript framework for building MCP servers with declarative definitions and observability.	MCP uptime, schema, auth, and SLA receipt monitoring.
Category & Scope	Monitoring	Monitoring
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-ts-core": {
      "command": "bunx",
      "args": [
        "@cyanheads/mcp-ts-core"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcpuptimeledger-mcp": {
      "url": "https://mcpuptimeledger.clauxel.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons