MCP Simulate vs Seraph

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Simulate and Seraph MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Simulate when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: simulate_evm.

Explore MCP Simulate Details

S

Choose Seraph when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Seraph Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP Simulate Finance & Fintech	S Seraph Finance & Fintech
Summary	MCP server for dry-run EVM transaction simulation via Crypto APIs	Crypto transaction firewall and risk tools for MCP agents.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-simulate": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@cryptoapis-io/mcp-simulate"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "seraph-2": {
      "url": "https://seraph.kondux.io/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons