Log inSubmit server

MCP Server Browser vs Reticle

A side-by-side look at the MCP Server Browser and Reticle MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.

MCP Server Browser logoMCP Server BrowserBrowser Automation · Local subprocess (stdio)The Open-Source Multimodal AI Agent Stack: Connecting Cutting-Edge AI Models and Agent Infra52GoodAuth: not declaredReticle logoReticleBrowser Automation · Local subprocess (stdio)Verify a running web app from the inside over MCP: look, act, observe, assert. No screenshots.49FairAuth: no auth required

Verdict: choose MCP Server Browser for browser automation work as a local process; choose Reticle for browser automation as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.

Which MCP server should you choose?

MCP Server Browser logoChoose MCP Server Browser when

  • You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
  • You prefer a local stdio subprocess transport.
Explore MCP Server Browser

Reticle logoChoose Reticle when

  • You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
  • You prefer a local stdio subprocess transport.
  • Its auth model fits you: No auth required.
Explore Reticle

Feature & specification comparison

Rows where the two servers differ are marked.

SpecMCP Server Browser logoMCP Server BrowserReticle logoReticle
CategoryBrowser AutomationBrowser Automation
Quality signal52/100 · Good49/100 · Fair
Install commandConfirmedConfirmed
TransportLocal subprocess (stdio)Local subprocess (stdio)
AuthNot declaredNo auth required
PricingNot declaredFree
Required env varsNone listedNone listed
Verified ownerCommunity listingCommunity listing
GitHub stars39,3441,269
Directory activity 2 views 0 installs 0 upvotes 1 views 0 installs 0 upvotes
ToolsNot listedNot listed
Full listingView MCP Server Browser View Reticle

Tools & capabilities

MCP Server Browser tools

No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.

Reticle tools

No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.

Ready-to-paste client configs

Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.

MCP Server Browser

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-server-browser": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@agent-tars/cli@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Reticle

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "reticle": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@reticlehq/server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently asked questions

MCP Server Browser is categorized under Browser Automation and uses a local stdio subprocess. Reticle belongs to Browser Automation and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick MCP Server Browser for browser automation work and Reticle for browser automation.

Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.

MCP Server Browser has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. Reticle is listed as free. Auth: no auth required. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.

Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add mcp-server-browser and reticle as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.

On AllMCPs, MCP Server Browser has a quality signal of 52/100 (Good) with 2 views, 0 installs and 39,344 GitHub stars. Reticle has 49/100 (Fair) with 1 views, 0 installs and 1,269 GitHub stars.

Popular comparisons with MCP Server Browser

Popular comparisons with Reticle