Astrocal Dev MCP vs Orita Provider Resolution

In-depth architectural comparison of the Astrocal Dev MCP and Orita Provider Resolution MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Astrocal Dev MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: check_availability, create_booking, cancel_booking.

Explore Astrocal Dev MCP Details

Choose Orita Provider Resolution when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: resolve_scheduling, get_resolution, hold_scheduling_option.

Explore Orita Provider Resolution Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Astrocal Dev MCP Developer Tools	Orita Provider Resolution Developer Tools
Summary	AI-native scheduling: check availability, book meetings, cancel and reschedule via MCP	Provider resolution for AI apps — search, rank, hold, confirm bookings across your provider network.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-server-50": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@astrocal/mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "orita-provider-resolution": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "orita-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons