Puter MCP vs Slivingdoc

In-depth architectural comparison of the Puter MCP and Slivingdoc MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Puter MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Puter MCP Details

Choose Slivingdoc when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Slivingdoc Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Puter MCP Developer Tools	Slivingdoc Developer Tools
Summary	Puter MCP enables AI tools to interact with Puter: manage files, websites, workers, and more	Share ordinary text files between concurrent agents without silently overwriting edits.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-server-43": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-server-43"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "slivingdoc": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "slivingdoc",
        "serve",
        "--bucket",
        "my-notes"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons