MCP Pirsch vs ReputeMap

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Pirsch and ReputeMap MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

M

Choose MCP Pirsch when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: pirsch_list_domains, pirsch_query_statistics, pirsch_list_filter_options.

Explore MCP Pirsch Details

Choose ReputeMap when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_locations, list_reviews, get_review_stats.

Explore ReputeMap Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	M MCP Pirsch Developer Tools	ReputeMap Developer Tools
Summary	Pirsch Analytics with natural language queries and trend analysis	Read and filter your Google Business Profile reviews, get stats, and send review requests.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-pirsch": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/inspector@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "reputemap-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons