MCP Kubernetes vs Runeward

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Kubernetes and Runeward MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Kubernetes when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Cloud Platforms domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore MCP Kubernetes Details

Choose Runeward when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Cloud Platforms domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Runeward Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP Kubernetes Cloud Platforms	Runeward Cloud Platforms
Summary	Kubernetes monitoring & ops for AI agents — safe-by-default access modes and guards.	Governed execution cells for AI agents: Docker/K8s sandboxes with policy, audit, and approvals.
Category & Scope	Cloud Platforms	Cloud Platforms
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-kubernetes": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@dockndevai/mcp-kubernetes"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "runeward": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "runeward"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons