Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
MCP Krs vs Swiss company data
In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Krs and Swiss company data MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
MCP Krs
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 55/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Swiss company data
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 40/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose MCP Krs if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Swiss company data if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
M
Choose MCP Krs when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
- Primary tools included: krs, rejestr.
S
Choose Swiss company data when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
MCP Krs Tools (2)
krs
1-10 digits, leading zeros padded automatically
rejestr
`P` (entrepreneurs register, default) or `S` (associations register).
Swiss company data Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
MCP Krs Configuration
Swiss company data Configuration