MCP Hashlib vs Apollo MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Hashlib and Apollo MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Hashlib when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore MCP Hashlib Details

Choose Apollo MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Apollo MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP Hashlib Developer Tools	Apollo MCP Server Developer Tools
Summary	An MCP server that exposes hashlib functionality	MCP server that exposes GraphQL operations as tools for AI models.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-hashlib": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "mcp-hashlib"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "apollo-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "apollo-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons