MCP Google Sheets Full vs Asana

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Google Sheets Full and Asana MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Google Sheets Full when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore MCP Google Sheets Full Details

Choose Asana when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Asana Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP Google Sheets Full Workplace & Productivity	Asana Workplace & Productivity
Summary	Full Google Sheets MCP: 26 tools + run_sheets_script escape hatch. User OAuth, no service account.	Asana MCP — wraps the Asana REST API (OAuth)
Category & Scope	Workplace & Productivity	Workplace & Productivity

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-google-sheets-full": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-google-sheets-full"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "asana": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "asana"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons