MCP Google Search Con… vs HasData Google Search… | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
MCP Google Search Console vs HasData Google Search (SERP)
In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Google Search Console and HasData Google Search (SERP) MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
MCP Google Search Console
Search & Data Extraction · Local stdio
Quality: 36/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
HasData Google Search (SERP)
Search & Data Extraction · Local stdio
Quality: 45/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose MCP Google Search Console if you need specialized Search & Data Extraction tools running via a local process. Choose HasData Google Search (SERP) if your workspace requires Search & Data Extraction integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose MCP Google Search Console when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
MCP Google Search Console is categorized under Search & Data Extraction and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, HasData Google Search (SERP) belongs to Search & Data Extraction using local stdio subprocess. Select MCP Google Search Console when you need capabilities focused on search & data extraction and HasData Google Search (SERP) when you require tools for search & data extraction.