MCP Google Ads vs AgentIQ

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Google Ads and AgentIQ MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Google Ads when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore MCP Google Ads Details

Choose AgentIQ when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore AgentIQ Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP Google Ads Marketing	AgentIQ Marketing
Summary	Multi-account Google Ads MCP: campaigns, keywords, search terms, and ad performance.	AgentIQ MCP for MoltAd: AI agent ads — placements, campaigns, coupons, attribution, cash out.
Category & Scope	Marketing	Marketing
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-google-ads": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "mcp-google-ads-multi"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agentiq": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "agentiq-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons