What is the key difference between MCP For API and NLocq?

MCP For API belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution, while NLocq belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution.

How do I install MCP For API or NLocq in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are MCP For API and NLocq free or paid?

MCP For API operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). NLocq operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

MCP For API lists 0 tools with 2 views and 71 GitHub stars. NLocq lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both MCP For API and NLocq together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

MCP For API vs NLocq

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP For API and NLocq MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

MCP For API

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 41/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

NLocq

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 5/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose MCP For API if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose NLocq if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP For API when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore MCP For API Details

Choose NLocq when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore NLocq Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP For API Developer Tools	N NLocq Developer Tools
Summary	MCP (Model Context Protocol) server for Appwrite	NLocq
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

MCP For API Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

NLocq Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

MCP For API Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-for-api": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-remote",
        "https://mcp.appwrite.io/"
      ]
    }
  }
}

NLocq Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "nlocq": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "nlocq"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

MCP For API is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, NLocq belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select MCP For API when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and NLocq when you require tools for developer tools.

More alternatives to MCP For API More alternatives to NLocq Developer Tools category hub