Andrea9293 MCP vs Muni Dev Cost — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Andrea9293 MCP vs Muni Dev Cost
In-depth architectural comparison of the Andrea9293 MCP and Muni Dev Cost MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Andrea9293 MCP
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 60/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Muni Dev Cost
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 52/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Andrea9293 MCP if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Muni Dev Cost if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Andrea9293 MCP when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Andrea9293 MCP is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Muni Dev Cost belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select Andrea9293 MCP when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Muni Dev Cost when you require tools for developer tools.
Lists files in the uploads folder with size and format info
get_ui_url
Returns the Web UI URL (e.g. http://localhost:3080) — useful to open the dashboard or to locate the uploads folder from the browser
search_documents
Semantic vector search within a specific document
search_all_documents
Hybrid (full-text + vector) cross-document search
get_context_window
Returns a window of chunks around a given chunk index
search_documents_with_ai
🤖 AI-powered search using Gemini (requires `GEMINI_API_KEY`)
Muni Dev Cost Tools (14)
get_dev_costs
The aggregated municipal development cost for a jurisdiction (single-family home), split into water+sewer vs other impact, with a per-fee summary and an honest coverage label.
get_fee_breakdown
Every fee line by line, grouped (Water / Sewer / Transportation / Parks / Drainage), with the **per-meter-size schedule** and each source + effective date.
compare_jurisdictions
Rank 2–12 markets side by side for **site selection** — total, water+sewer split, the dollar/% spread and what it costs on a 100-unit project.
get_water_sewer_detail
Water & sewer connection cost **by meter size** (5/8" → 12") — the single biggest swing in a utility connection budget.
estimate_dev_cost
Whole-project fees (fees × units) with per-unit and extended line items, dev-type aware, explicit about exclusions.
list_jurisdictions
The full **coverage map** — every jurisdiction, its depth and data freshness, which publish a per-meter schedule, plus the benchmark states.
get_fee_schedule_source
The published **source document + per-fee provenance** (published vs estimated) behind a jurisdiction's number — defensible *trazabilidad* for a pro-forma.
get_cost_trend
The **real dated revision history** of a jurisdiction's headline fee (prior years + adopted future steps) with YoY delta and CAGR — never a projection.
compare_by_meter_size
One jurisdiction's water/sewer cost across **every published meter size**, ratioed to the 5/8" residential base.
estimate_by_units
Multifamily/mixed** fee estimate by LUE (units × LUE-per-unit) — the way cities actually bill MF, so it doesn't overstate fees.
get_total_dev_cost
The **grand total across every fee category** (water/sewer, transportation, parks, drainage, public-safety, other), bucketed — with honest $0 buckets where a city simply doesn't charge that category.
breakdown_by_fee_category
Every line item within **one** category (e.g. all of a city's parks fees) with per-meter detail — errors honestly if the city doesn't levy that category.