MCP CPG Agent Protoco… vs MCP CPG Human in the… | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
MCP CPG Agent Protocols vs MCP CPG Human in the Loop (HITL)
In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP CPG Agent Protocols and MCP CPG Human in the Loop (HITL) MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
MCP CPG Agent Protocols
Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 36/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
MCP CPG Human in the Loop (HITL)
Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 36/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose MCP CPG Agent Protocols if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose MCP CPG Human in the Loop (HITL) if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose MCP CPG Agent Protocols when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
MCP CPG Agent Protocols is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, MCP CPG Human in the Loop (HITL) belongs to Developer Tools using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select MCP CPG Agent Protocols when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and MCP CPG Human in the Loop (HITL) when you require tools for developer tools.