Mcp Bastion vs Schemadriftgate Mcp

In-depth architectural comparison of the Mcp Bastion and Schemadriftgate Mcp MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

M

Choose Mcp Bastion when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Mcp Bastion Details

Choose Schemadriftgate Mcp when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: check_schema_drift, approve_tool_schema, record_tool_receipt.

Explore Schemadriftgate Mcp Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	M Mcp Bastion Security	Schemadriftgate Mcp Security
Summary	Reliability + security proxy for MCP: runtime tool-security and a compliance-mapped audit trail.	Paid remote MCP for schema drift checks, approvals, receipts, and release audit logs.
Category & Scope	Security	Security
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-bastion": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-bastion",
        "--config",
        "bastion.config.json"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "schemadriftgate-mcp": {
      "url": "https://schemadriftgate.clauxel.com/?utm_source=github&utm_medium=directory&utm_campaign=sbl202605"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons