MCP Audit vs SatRank — Lightning trust + audit oracle

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Audit and SatRank — Lightning trust + audit oracle MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Audit when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore MCP Audit Details

Choose SatRank — Lightning trust + audit oracle when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore SatRank — Lightning trust + audit oracle Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP Audit Security	SatRank — Lightning trust + audit oracle Security
Summary	Transparent audit proxy for MCP servers: logs every tool call, flags poisoning and rug pulls.	Lightning trust + audit oracle. Score, pay, and audit L402 endpoints with Ed25519 receipts.
Category & Scope	Security	Security

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-audit-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "satrank-lightning-trust-audit-oracle": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "satrank-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons