️ Not for Production Use! vs Nightglass

In-depth architectural comparison of the ️ Not for Production Use! and Nightglass MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose ️ Not for Production Use! when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore ️ Not for Production Use! Details

Choose Nightglass when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Nightglass Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	️ Not for Production Use! Developer Tools	Nightglass Developer Tools
Summary	Preview release of FusionAuth API MCP server	Screenshot API for MCP clients. Capture any URL as PNG with mockup mode support.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-api": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/inspector"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "nightglass": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "nightglass"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons