PolicyForge MCP Server vs Filevine MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the PolicyForge MCP Server and Filevine MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose PolicyForge MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: generate_policy, generate_baa, regenerate_policy.

Explore PolicyForge MCP Server Details

Choose Filevine MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: authenticate, auth-status, logout.

Explore Filevine MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	PolicyForge MCP Server Legal	Filevine MCP Legal
Summary	Generate, audit, and maintain legal policies that match what your code actually does.	Open-source MCP server connecting Claude to Filevine practice management. Built by Oktopeak.
Category & Scope	Legal	Legal
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-52": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@policyforge/mcp@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "filevine-mcp-2": {
      "url": "https://api.filevine.io"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons