PolicyForge MCP Server vs Entscheidsuche — Schw… | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
PolicyForge MCP Server vs Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide
In-depth architectural comparison of the PolicyForge MCP Server and Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
PolicyForge MCP Server
Legal · Local stdio
Quality: 52/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide
Legal · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 49/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose PolicyForge MCP Server if you need specialized Legal tools running via a local process. Choose Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide if your workspace requires Legal integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose PolicyForge MCP Server when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Generate a policy and return its Markdown content + hosted URL. Consumes one policy from your quota.
generate_baa
Generate a HIPAA Business Associate Agreement between a covered entity and a vendor handling PHI. Built from the clauses required by 45 CFR 164.504(e) and validated clause by clause. Pro plan; never publicly hosted. Consumes one policy from your quota.
regenerate_policy
Re-run the AI engine with changed business context — same ID and hosted URL, previous content saved as a version.
update_policy
Hand-edit a policy in place — same ID and hosted URL, so published links keep working.
audit_compliance
Gap analysis: compare what the code does (your scanned manifest) with what a policy discloses.
check_policy_freshness
Drift detection: diff the current codebase scan against the manifest stored at generation time.
list_policy_versions
Version history — a snapshot is saved before every update, regeneration, or restore.
restore_policy_version
Roll a policy back to any previous version (itself reversible).
list_policies
List policies on your account (filter by type/status, paginate).
get_policy
Fetch a single policy by ID, including full content.
delete_policy
Permanently delete a policy (its hosted URL stops working).
get_usage
Check your tier and remaining generation quota before generating.
+3 more tools listed on main page
Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide Tools (6)
search
Volltextsuche mit Lucene-Syntax. Filter nach Entscheiddatum, Scrape-Datum, Hierarchie (Kanton / Gericht / Kammer) und Sprache. Sortierung nach Relevanz, Entscheiddatum oder Scrape-Datum. Paginierung über `next_cursor` / `search_after`. Aggregationen für Facetten-Auswertung.
search_by_case_number
Exakte Phrasensuche nach Geschäftsnummern, Aktenzeichen und BGE-Zitaten (z.B. `BGE 142 III 1`, `6B_1234/2025`, `5A_396/2015`). Setzt die Nummer automatisch in Anführungszeichen.
fetch_document
Vollständigen Entscheid samt Volltext anhand der ID abrufen.
list_hierarchy
Hierarchie-IDs (Bund / Kanton / Gericht / Kammer) mit Trefferzahlen.
list_facets
Hierarchischer Facetten-Baum mit lokalisierten Labels in DE/FR/IT.
server_info
Versions- und Konfigurationsinformationen.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
PolicyForge MCP Server is categorized under Legal and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide belongs to Legal using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select PolicyForge MCP Server when you need capabilities focused on legal and Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide when you require tools for legal.