Blackforge So MCP vs Bity

In-depth architectural comparison of the Blackforge So MCP and Bity MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Blackforge So MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Blackforge So MCP Details

Choose Bity when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Bity Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Blackforge So MCP blackforge-so Finance & Fintech	Bity Finance & Fintech
Summary	Crypto market data: order book depth, liquidity lifetimes and taker flow on 9 spot venues	Bity crypto bank (Bitybank / Bitypreço), account balance per coin, market data (ticker, order book,
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-390": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-390"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bity": {
      "url": "https://claude.ai/customize/connectors?modal=add-custom-connector&mcpName=Bity&mcpServerUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.mcp.ai%2Fp_bity"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons