Snyk Ls vs MCP Audit

In-depth architectural comparison of the Snyk Ls and MCP Audit MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Snyk Ls when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Snyk Ls Details

Choose MCP Audit when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Stdio and HTTP MCP proxying, JSONL and SQLite audit storage, HMAC-SHA256 audit signing.

Explore MCP Audit Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Snyk Ls snyk Security	MCP Audit P4ST4S Security
Summary	Easily find and fix security issues in your applications leveraging Snyk platform capabilities.	Transparent Go proxy that intercepts, signs, rate-limits, redacts, and audits all MCP JSON-RPC tool calls without modifying client or server.
Category & Scope	Security

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-357": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-357"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "p4st4s-mcp-audit": {
      "command": "go",
      "args": [
        "install",
        "github.com/P4ST4S/mcp-audit/cmd/mcp-audit@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons