Noncelogic MCP vs Pagerunner

In-depth architectural comparison of the Noncelogic MCP and Pagerunner MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Noncelogic MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: navigate, interact, extract_schema.

Explore Noncelogic MCP Details

Choose Pagerunner when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_profiles, open_session, attach_session.

Explore Pagerunner Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Noncelogic MCP noncelogic Browser Automation	Pagerunner Browser Automation
Summary	Hosted Playwright API for AI agents. Returns a11y trees instead of screenshots.	Chrome browser automation MCP server for AI agents — drives real Chrome with your profiles
Category & Scope	Browser Automation	Browser Automation

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-313": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@roveapi/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pagerunner": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "pagerunner"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons