SitePulsar MCP Server vs Aya Registry

In-depth architectural comparison of the SitePulsar MCP Server and Aya Registry MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose SitePulsar MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: check_agent_readiness, run_audit, get_audit.

Explore SitePulsar MCP Server Details

Choose Aya Registry when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search_companies, get_company_details, index_company.

Explore Aya Registry Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	SitePulsar MCP Server Developer Tools	Aya Registry Developer Tools
Summary	SitePulsar AEO audits: fetch FIND/READ/USE agent-readiness scores for any website.	Search 367k+ verified businesses; earn cashback when an agent routes a real purchase.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-31": {
      "url": "https://mcp.sitepulsar.ai/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "aya-registry": {
      "url": "https://ai-visionary.xyz/agents/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons