Agent Safe Pipeline vs Sunaiva Gate — Agent Rule Enforcement

In-depth architectural comparison of the Agent Safe Pipeline and Sunaiva Gate — Agent Rule Enforcement MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Agent Safe Pipeline when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Agent Safe Pipeline Details

S

Choose Sunaiva Gate — Agent Rule Enforcement when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Sunaiva Gate — Agent Rule Enforcement Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Agent Safe Pipeline decionis Developer Tools	S Sunaiva Gate — Agent Rule Enforcement Developer Tools
Summary	Fail-closed policy gate for AI agent actions, with local evaluation and native pre-tool hooks.	MCP enforcement layer that intercepts AI agent actions and blocks rule violations before execution.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-224": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@decionis/verify@0.2.0"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sunaiva-gate-agent-rule-enforcement": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "sunaiva-gate-agent-rule-enforcement"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons