Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Яндекс.Директ vs DeplodropAI
In-depth architectural comparison of the Яндекс.Директ and DeplodropAI MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Яндекс.Директ
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
DeplodropAI
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 54/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Яндекс.Директ if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose DeplodropAI if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Я
Choose Яндекс.Директ when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
D
Choose DeplodropAI when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Яндекс.Директ Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
DeplodropAI Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Яндекс.Директ Configuration
DeplodropAI Configuration
Frequently Asked Questions
More alternatives to Яндекс.ДиректMore alternatives to DeplodropAIDeveloper Tools category hubCanonical compare URL