Cite42 MCP vs Seo Audit Console

In-depth architectural comparison of the Cite42 MCP and Seo Audit Console MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

C

Choose Cite42 MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Cite42 MCP Details

Choose Seo Audit Console when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Seo Audit Console Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C Cite42 MCP Marketing	Seo Audit Console Marketing
Summary	AI search visibility, brand rankings, AI citations, SEO keywords, and trends from Cite42.	Technical SEO audits in Claude: GSC + first-party crawl + DataForSEO. 93 prioritised checks + fixes.
Category & Scope	Marketing	Marketing
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-167": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-167"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "seo-audit-console": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "-",
        "point"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons