Translatize MCP vs Unicorn Screener

In-depth architectural comparison of the Translatize MCP and Unicorn Screener MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Translatize MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Translatize MCP Details

U

Choose Unicorn Screener when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Unicorn Screener Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Translatize MCP Developer Tools	U Unicorn Screener Developer Tools
Summary	Read, search, edit and branch Translatize translation labels and fill missing translations.	Search startups, look up scores, request research memos and read public startup research.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-149": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@translatize/cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "unicorn-screener": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "unicorn-screener"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons