Sequentum MCP vs Scrapling MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Sequentum MCP and Scrapling MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Sequentum MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: OAuth 2.0 (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_agents, get_agent, search_agents.

Explore Sequentum MCP Details

Choose Scrapling MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Stealth HTTP fetching, Real-browser and headless fetching, CSS selector parsing.

Explore Scrapling MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Sequentum MCP Search & Data Extraction	Scrapling MCP Server Search & Data Extraction
Summary	Turn the web into structured, reliable, actionable enterprise data for AI Agents	Web scraping with stealth HTTP, real browsers, and Cloudflare bypass. CSS selectors supported.
Category & Scope	Search & Data Extraction	Search & Data Extraction

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-134": {
      "url": "https://mcp.sequentum.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "scrapling-mcp-server": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "scrapling"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons