Reglyze MCP vs Federated AI Commons

In-depth architectural comparison of the Reglyze MCP and Federated AI Commons MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

R

Choose Reglyze MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Reglyze MCP Details

Choose Federated AI Commons when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Federated AI Commons Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	R Reglyze MCP Security	Federated AI Commons Security
Summary	NIS2 compliance tools: scope check, EU transposition status, per-country incident deadlines.	MCP server for a federated AI-commons governance simulation with a verified compliance oracle.
Category & Scope	Security	Security
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-130": {
      "url": "https://reglyze.com/en/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "federated-ai-commons": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "mesa"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons