Ithura MCP vs Superlist

In-depth architectural comparison of the Ithura MCP and Superlist MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Ithura MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Ithura MCP Details

S

Choose Superlist when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Superlist Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Ithura MCP Developer Tools	S Superlist Developer Tools
Summary	Manage tasks, sprints, projects, and wiki pages in your Ithura workspace.	Manage Superlist tasks and lists in plain language from any MCP-compatible AI agent.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-102": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "ithura-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "superlist": {
      "url": "https://app.superlist.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons