Mazdek AI — Kurdish Language Tools vs Vox

In-depth architectural comparison of the Mazdek AI — Kurdish Language Tools and Vox MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

M

Choose Mazdek AI — Kurdish Language Tools when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Text-to-Speech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Mazdek AI — Kurdish Language Tools Details

Choose Vox when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Text-to-Speech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: listen, speak.

Explore Vox Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	M Mazdek AI — Kurdish Language Tools Text-to-Speech	Vox Text-to-Speech
Summary	Kurdish-first AI tools: translation (250+ languages), spell check, grammar and Kurdish TTS.	Native macOS MCP server for voice I/O — Swift binary, SFSpeechRecognizer + ElevenLabs TTS.
Category & Scope	Text-to-Speech	Text-to-Speech
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mazdek-ai-kurdish-language-tools": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mazdek-ai-kurdish-language-tools"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "vox": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "vox"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons