Markifact: AI Performance Marketing vs Obol

In-depth architectural comparison of the Markifact: AI Performance Marketing and Obol MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Markifact: AI Performance Marketing when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Markifact: AI Performance Marketing Details

Choose Obol when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Obol Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Markifact: AI Performance Marketing Finance & Fintech	Obol Finance & Fintech
Summary	AI marketing agent for Google Ads, Meta, GA4, TikTok, LinkedIn, Shopify, HubSpot and more.	Solana agent gateway via x402. Wallet, token, DeFi, and swap tools. Pay per request.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "markifact-ai-performance-marketing": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "obol": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "obol-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons