Manzanas vs Zen MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Manzanas and Zen MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Manzanas when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Accessibility-based UI inspection and interaction, TTL leases with FIFO queuing, Warm simulator park and thaw.

Explore Manzanas Details

Choose Zen MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• You have access to required keys: ZEN_DEBUG_PORT.
• Primary tools included: 20 browser automation tools including navigation, form filling, and screenshots, Direct WebDriver BiDi protocol communication over WebSocket, Supports React, Vue, and Angular apps with native event dispatch.

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Manzanas VerifiedBrowser Automation	Zen MCP sh6drack Browser Automation
Summary
Category & Scope	Browser Automation

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "manzanas": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "manzanasd-client@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sh6drack-zen-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "sh6drack-zen-mcp"
      ],
      "env": {
        "ZEN_DEBUG_PORT": "YOUR_ZEN_DEBUG_PORT_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons