Mac Control MCP vs Kill Process MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Mac Control MCP and Kill Process MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Mac Control MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the OS Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: capture_screen, capture_screen_v2, capture_window.

Explore Mac Control MCP Details

Choose Kill Process MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the OS Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: process_list, process_kill.

Explore Kill Process MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Mac Control MCP OS Automation	Kill Process MCP misiektoja OS Automation
Summary	Native Swift macOS automation MCP — 63 tools: AX, browser, capture, OCR, Spotlight, windows.	List and terminate OS processes via natural language queries
Category & Scope	OS Automation	OS Automation

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mac-control-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mac-control-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "misiektoja-kill-process-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "kill-process-mcp@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons