M365 Graph MCP vs SenderKit

In-depth architectural comparison of the M365 Graph MCP and SenderKit MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

M

Choose M365 Graph MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore M365 Graph MCP Details

Choose SenderKit when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore SenderKit Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	M M365 Graph MCP Communication	SenderKit Communication
Summary	Manage Microsoft 365 email, calendar, contacts and inbox rules via the Graph API with OAuth 2.0.	Build and send email, SMS, and push straight from your AI agent.
Category & Scope	Communication	Communication
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "m365-graph-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "m365-graph-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "senderkit": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons