AI Dev Analytics vs World Monitor

In-depth architectural comparison of the AI Dev Analytics and World Monitor MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose AI Dev Analytics when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• You have access to required keys: NODE_ENV.
• Primary tools included: One-stop governance skill to detect duplicate, conflicting, or obsolete AI rules, Layered decision memory with automatic loading in Claude Code, Local dashboard showing AI asset inventory including rules, skills, decisions, and plugins.

Explore AI Dev Analytics Details

Choose World Monitor when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: other (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: .

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	AI Dev Analytics LWTlong Monitoring	World Monitor Monitoring
Summary
Category & Scope	Monitoring	Monitoring
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lwtlong-ai-dev-analytics": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "aida"
      ],
      "env": {
        "NODE_ENV": "YOUR_NODE_ENV_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "world-monitor": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "worldmonitor"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons