Lune Research vs Scholar MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Lune Research and Scholar MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Lune Research when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search_papers, search_papers_many, search_related_papers.

Explore Lune Research Details

S

Choose Scholar MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search_papers, get_paper, get_author.

Explore Scholar MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Lune Research Developer Tools	S Scholar MCP Server Developer Tools
Summary	Search peer-reviewed papers and research methodology guidance from your AI agent.	Academic literature search, citation graphs, and PDF conversion via Semantic Scholar.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lune-research-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@retrograde-labs/lune-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "scholar-mcp-server": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "--from"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons