Lumail vs SignatureForever

In-depth architectural comparison of the Lumail and SignatureForever MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Lumail when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Lumail Details

S

Choose SignatureForever when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore SignatureForever Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Lumail Communication	S SignatureForever Communication
Summary	Official Lumail email marketing MCP for campaigns, subscribers, and workflows.	Audit and build email signatures that survive Gmail, Outlook desktop and Apple Mail.
Category & Scope	Communication	Communication
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lumail": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "lumail"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "signatureforever": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "signatureforever"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons