Lumail vs Sendly

In-depth architectural comparison of the Lumail and Sendly MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Lumail when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Lumail Details

S

Choose Sendly when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Sendly Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Lumail Communication	S Sendly Communication
Summary	Official Lumail email marketing MCP for campaigns, subscribers, and workflows.	Send email, manage contacts, campaigns and workflows, and diagnose deliverability in Sendly.
Category & Scope	Communication	Communication
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lumail": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "lumail"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sendly": {
      "url": "https://docs.sendly.now/guides/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons