Lookacrawler vs ShadowCrawl

In-depth architectural comparison of the Lookacrawler and ShadowCrawl MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Lookacrawler when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Lookacrawler Details

Choose ShadowCrawl when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore ShadowCrawl Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Lookacrawler lucasmartins-ai Search & Data Extraction	ShadowCrawl Search & Data Extraction
Summary	Free, open-source, token-efficient local alternative to Firecrawl with native MCP Server for LLMs (>73% token reduction, Playwright stealth anti-bot bypass).	Rust MCP stealth scraper: anti-bot search/scrape with CDP fallback + HITL non-robot.
Category & Scope	Search & Data Extraction

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lucasmartins-ai-lookacrawler": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "lucasmartins-ai-lookacrawler"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "shadowcrawl": {
      "url": "https://api.openai.com/v1"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons