Lore vs Yantrikdb MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Lore and Yantrikdb MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Lore when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: remember, recall, forget.

Explore Lore Details

Y

Choose Yantrikdb MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: remember, recall, forget.

Explore Yantrikdb MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Lore Knowledge & Memory	Y Yantrikdb MCP Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Cross-agent memory over MCP: hybrid recall, knowledge graph, private/shared visibility, redaction.	Cognitive memory for AI agents — semantic recall, knowledge graph, and contradiction detection
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lore": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "--from"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "yantrikdb-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "yantrikdb-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons