Lobbywatch MCP vs Expenselm MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Lobbywatch MCP and Expenselm MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Lobbywatch MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Lobbywatch MCP Details

Choose Expenselm MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Expenselm MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Lobbywatch MCP Developer Tools	Expenselm MCP Server Developer Tools
Summary	Lobbywatch.ch transparency data on parliamentarians, interests, access badges	An MCP server that provides access to your expense data on ExpenseLM.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lobbywatch-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "lobbywatch-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "expenselm-mcp-server": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "expenselm-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons