Lm vs MCP Rubber Duck
A side-by-side look at the Lm and MCP Rubber Duck MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Lm for conversational ai work as a local process; choose MCP Rubber Duck for conversational ai as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose Lm when
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Conversational AI domain.
- You prefer a local stdio subprocess transport.
- You have the keys it needs:
HOUTINI_LM_ENDPOINT_URL, HOUTINI_LM_API_KEY, HOUTINI_LM_MODEL, HOUTINI_LM_SERIALISE. - You want tools like
chat, custom_prompt, code_task.
Choose MCP Rubber Duck when
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Conversational AI domain.
- You prefer a local stdio subprocess transport.
- Its auth model fits you: API key required.
- You want tools like
ask_duck, chat_with_duck, clear_conversations.
Feature & specification comparison
Rows where the two servers differ are marked.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Conversational AI | Conversational AI |
| Quality signal | 61/100 · Good | 68/100 · Great |
| Install command | Confirmed | Confirmed |
| Transport | Local subprocess (stdio) | Local subprocess (stdio) |
| Auth | Not declared | API key required |
| Pricing | Not declared | BYOK (pay the provider) |
| Required env vars | HOUTINI_LM_ENDPOINT_URLHOUTINI_LM_API_KEYHOUTINI_LM_MODELHOUTINI_LM_SERIALISE | None listed |
| Verified owner | Community listing | Community listing |
| GitHub stars | 121 | 180 |
| Directory activity | 0 views 0 installs 0 upvotes | 5 views 0 installs 0 upvotes |
| Tools | 8 | 15 |
| Full listing | View Lm | View MCP Rubber Duck |
Tools & capabilities
Lm tools 8
chatThe workhorse. Send a task, get an answer. The description includes planning triggers that nudge Claude to identify offloadable work when it's starting a big task.custom_promptThree-part prompt: system, context, instruction. Keeping them separate prevents context bleed - consistently outperforms stuffing everything into one message, especially with local models. I tested this properly one weekend - took the same batch of review tasks and ran them both ways. Splitting thi…code_taskBuilt for code analysis. Pre-configured system prompt with temperature and output constraints tuned per model family via the routing layer.code_task_filesLike `code_task`, but the local LLM reads files directly from disk — source never passes through the MCP client's context window. Use this when reviewing multiple related files, or a single large file that's awkward to paste. Files are read in parallel with `Promise.allSettled`, so one unreadable f…embedGenerate text embeddings via the OpenAI-compatible `/v1/embeddings` endpoint. Requires an embedding model to be available - Nomic Embed is a solid choice. Returns the vector, dimension count, and usage stats.discoverHealth check and speed readout. Returns model name, context window, capability profile, connection latency (labelled explicitly — this is the `/v1/models` fetch round-trip, *not* inference speed), and the active model's measured tok/s and TTFT averaged over the session. Before any real call has run…list_modelsLists everything on the LLM server - loaded and downloaded - with full metadata: architecture, quantisation, context window, capabilities, and HuggingFace enrichment data. Shows capability profiles describing what each model is best at, so Claude can make informed delegation decisions.statsCompact markdown dump of your offload stats — session and lifetime totals, per-model performance history, reasoning-token overhead — without the model catalog that `discover` prints. Cheap to call repeatedly to watch the 💰 counter climb.
MCP Rubber Duck tools 15
ask_duckAsk a single question to a specific LLM providerchat_with_duckConversation with context maintained across messagesclear_conversationsClear all conversation historylist_ducksList configured providers and health statuslist_modelsList available models for providerscompare_ducksAsk the same question to multiple providers simultaneouslyduck_councilGet responses from all configured ducksget_usage_statsUsage statistics and estimated costsduck_voteMulti-duck voting with reasoning and confidenceduck_judgeHave one duck evaluate and rank others' responsesduck_iterateIteratively refine a response between two ducksduck_debateStructured multi-round debate between ducks- +3 more on the listing page
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
Lm
{
"mcpServers": {
"lm": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@houtini/lm"
],
"env": {
"HOUTINI_LM_ENDPOINT_URL": "YOUR_HOUTINI_LM_ENDPOINT_URL_HERE",
"HOUTINI_LM_API_KEY": "YOUR_HOUTINI_LM_API_KEY_HERE",
"HOUTINI_LM_MODEL": "YOUR_HOUTINI_LM_MODEL_HERE",
"HOUTINI_LM_SERIALISE": "YOUR_HOUTINI_LM_SERIALISE_HERE"
}
}
}
}
MCP Rubber Duck
{
"mcpServers": {
"nesquikm-mcp-rubber-duck": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"mcp-rubber-duck"
]
}
}
}
Frequently asked questions
Lm is categorized under Conversational AI and uses a local stdio subprocess. MCP Rubber Duck belongs to Conversational AI and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick Lm for conversational ai work and MCP Rubber Duck for conversational ai.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
Lm has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. MCP Rubber Duck is bring-your-own-key: usage is billed by the API provider you supply a key for. Auth: api key required. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add lm and nesquikm-mcp-rubber-duck as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, Lm has a quality signal of 61/100 (Good) with 0 views, 0 installs and 121 GitHub stars. MCP Rubber Duck has 68/100 (Great) with 5 views, 0 installs and 180 GitHub stars.